Hume's Philosophy about reason and Passion Essay

Humes Philosophy about reason and Passion - Essay ExampleHumes doctrine about Reason & Passion David Hume was a historian & philosopher in the mid of 18th century from Scotland. innate(p) on May 7, 1711 & died on August 25, 1776, Hume was one of the most important philosophers of that time & is regarded with many undischarged western philosophers of modern times. He was famous for his philosophical predilections about human empiricism & skepticism. He purposed the ideas of lovingness that they drive human beings rather than logical abstract thought or thinking. Hence he was a modern-day of Rene Descartes, a French philosopher of 17th century, who argued that human mind is a thinking thing & it follows the logical reasoning about every(prenominal)thing. Hume was strongly opposed to this idea of presenting human minds & he tried to establish a mod & natural science about psychology of human nature. In his famous publication A Treatise of sympathetic Nature Being an Attempt to i ntroduce the experimental Method of Reasoning into Moral Subjects, he argued that the echt force which is responsible for all human activities is their desires or passions about something. Whenever anyone tends to pull towards something, it may be gold or a loved one or anything else he makes every possible chance to run the goals. Reason can non be wholly or completely the driving force, it is a part of passion or in Humes own words, a slave of passions. ... The knowledge which humans take by their make out helps them to decide what is right & what is wrong for them. In the lights of all these combined perceptions, anyone becomes able to find the right expressive style towards success & achievements. He regarded passions as the treatment of free wills & emotions & that the moral ethics are based upon the feelings not upon the moral principles. According to him humans do not bother any kind of rules when it comes to a unmated situation, neither they follow the logical reasonin g according to the circumstances, but they follow their instincts & senses & be vex accordingly. Unless the passion is not build on any false concepts, like such thing which do not have any existence, for example fear from ghosts or such things which usually dont come in our way it is the thing which determines what to do & what not. Hence passion can never be unreasonable since every person has his/her own logics to justify his/her passion about anything or anyone (Hume. 1739). Many scholars of that time harshly condemned this idea of Hume. They said that it is impossible not to have any kind of moral ethics or a set of rules described for the humans. In this way, any human being will do whatever he/she will want & the world will become a place where exclusively desires are carry out at any cost. This also goes in the opposite way of religion since it addresses not to obey only passions but moral ethics & reasons determine ones path to follow. They also claim the textbook to be very abstract & meaningless & as a combination of jumbled words. However, many scholars & philosophers of forthwiths time also consider his treatise a modern work in philosophy & phone him as